Health care, employment, war on Iraq, housing crisis, the looming threat of recession - all are serious issues that the next U.S. President has to remediate. As if the list is not long enough, climate change and tourism emissions must be added to top it off. Which Presidential candidate can tackle this daunting challenge?
Know More
Setting aside personal viewpoints of political affiliations, the inherent need to address climate change is a topic of primary concern for this 2008 presidential election. Although the United States is the largest emitter of greenhouse gases, the country has lagged behind the international community in mitigating these impacts. The Pew Center on Global Climate Change reports that the U.S. accounts for approximately 25 per cent of global emissions. The effects of these emissions are prevalent from the South Pacific to the Polar Regions. To address this issue, a global agreement to reduce emissions was adopted in 1997 and implemented in 2005. Considered the most comprehensive international climate change accord, the Kyoto Protocol set emission reduction targets and was ratified by the majority of signatory countries. However, the Unites States denied the sanction, further hindering the success of mitigating global warming.
Regardless of the politics surrounding this issue, a growing concern for the plight of planet Earth has permeated throughout American communities. Many Americans are aware that the next U.S. President must address the country’s impact on climate change just as much as improving health care or other issues. The Earthlab Poll allows the public to provide their opinion whether “a presidential candidates’ views on global warming affects how citizens vote for them.” Out of the 47,217 responses received as of February 8, an overwhelming amount of 83% indicated yes, followed by 10% maybe and 7% no. The indication can not be more evident, that the majority of American citizens are concerned about global warming and want the next President to actively tackle this issue.
In order to effectively reduce emissions, it is vital that the candidates include mitigating tourism emissions in environmental policies. As the world’s largest industry, our leisure and business travel poses serious threats to the global warming epidemic. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) indicates that current transportation levels are responsible for more than 60% of air travel and a large share of greenhouse gas (ghg) emissions. According to the World Tourism Organization (WTO), the year 2007 demonstrated unprecedented growth with the number of international arrivals reaching approximately 900 million an increase of 6% from 2006. In 2006, the USA exhibited over 51 million in inbound arrivals and 30 million in outbound travel.
So what are the environmental viewpoints of the Presidential candidates? The League of Conservation Voters provides information about each candidate’s stance on global warming. Check it out for yourself and make your own conclusions, on who will best redirect the United States from the status as guilty emissions emitter to a leader in sustainability. Keep in mind what proposed methods will decrease tourism emissions most effectively.
CANDIDATES
|
CARBON CAP AND TARGETS
|
FUEL EFFICIENCY
|
RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY STANDARD
|
EFFICIENCY TARGETS
|
|
Hillary Clinton
|
Supports 80% reductions by 2050
|
Supports 55 mpg fleetwide standard by 2030 |
Supports 25% standard by 2025
|
Supports 20% reduction in energy consumption by 2020
|
|
Mike Huckabee
|
No articulated position
|
General support for efficiency; no target specified
|
Supports 15% standard by 2020, which includes nuclear power
|
No articulated position
|
|
John McCain
|
Lead author of bill to reduce emissions 65% by 2050
|
Supports fuel efficiency increase, no standard specified
|
Opposed 10% standard in 2005; opposed 20% standard in 2002
|
Supports a cap on carbon emissions; no target specified
|
|
Barack Obama
|
Supports 80% reductions by 2050
|
Supports 50 mpg fleetwide standard in 18 years
|
Supports 25% standard by 2025
|
Supports 50% reduction in energy intensity by 2030
|
My Know How:
In my opinion, the vast majority of Americans are ready for a change. The past 8 years have left many of us in a tumultuous cloud of uncertainty, disappointment, outrage, embarrassment and lack of faith in the decisions made by our leaders. The transition of passing the Presidential torch is always a time of hope or on the contrary, apprehension. Currently, so many issues are affecting the daily lives of American citizens that we hope the next President will transform society for the wellbeing of the citizens. Additionally, the wellbeing of the world is dependent on the actions this country takes in many areas, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The United States has the capacity to relinquish consumptive habits and excel in sustainability. The major requisite is the action from a leader who acknowledges environmental policy, clean energy and climate change as crucial concerns.